Cover of The Kingdom of Speech, by Tom Wolfe, 2016. Taken, of course, on my Tom Wolfe bookshelf. (Photo by Mark C. Taylor.) |
Tom Wolfe is still rocking those white suits! |
Yes! Tom Wolfe is back!!! The sharply-dressed wordsmith
returns with The Kingdom of Speech, his
first non-fiction work since his 2000 collection of essays, Hooking Up. But you have to go back to
1981 and From Bauhaus to Our House to
find Wolfe’s last extended, book-length piece of non-fiction. That seems
fitting, because The Kingdom of Speech fits
in well with From Bauhaus to Our House, Wolfe’s
scathing critique of modern architecture, and The Painted Word, his 1975 lambasting of the modern art scene.
Wolfe is an enemy of conformity, and while some interpret
his critiques of art and architecture and conclude that he’s really a
conservative figure, I would argue that what he’s really saying is to question
orthodoxy and authority. Wolfe might actually be more radical than people
think. Wolfe has often come under fire from liberals because he attacks liberal
orthodoxies, and as a liberal, I think I can say that liberals generally don’t
like it when their reality gets questioned. As William F. Buckley once said, “Liberals
claim to want to give a hearing to other views, but then are shocked and
offended to discover that there are other views.” We tend to see things in
black and white, as a dichotomy. If you’re against modern architecture, then,
ipso facto, you must be a conservative! If you’re against modern art, then you’re
not part of the vanguard! You’re not on the cutting edge! Wolfe is always
interested in how certain ideas or theories become entrenched-the way styles of
art and architecture became entrenched, and how once they become the orthodoxy,
how anyone who questions them is quickly branded a heretic.
In The Kingdom of
Speech, Wolfe sets his sights on Charles Darwin and Noam Chomsky.
Specifically, Wolfe is interested in how speech evolved in human beings.
According to Wolfe, no one has been able to truly explain this-which as Wolfe
says, is what really made man able to dominate all of the other species on the
planet. Wolfe goes back to Charles Darwin as he traces Darwin’s writing of On the Origin of Species, which was
partially published to beat Alfred Russel Wallace into print, as Wallace had independently
developed the same theory. Wolfe then examines Darwin’s theories about how
language developed…which leads into Wolfe taking on Chomsky, who has long been
the reigning linguistic theorist. Wolfe sums up some of the research of Daniel
Everett, who found a lost tribe in the Amazon whose language seems to
contradict some of Chomsky’s key theories.
I am not enough of an expert on language or linguistic
theory to definitively say that Wolfe is right or wrong, but The Kingdom of Speech is an entertaining
read. Wolfe’s style is his usual, love it or hate it, stream of consciousness
ramble. I’ve seen some reviewers who have mocked Wolfe’s flights of fancy, asking
“How does he go from this to that?” but in asking that question it seems clear
that they don’t understand how stream of consciousness works. Unlike some other
Wolfe books, the first exclamation point doesn’t appear until the bottom of the
second page! But have no fear; Wolfe’s trademark wit and sarcasm are still
fully intact. Oh, and this time, unlike The
Painted Word and From Bauhaus to Our
House, there are footnotes!
As with Wolfe’s other books, The Kingdom of Speech has been controversial, and debates have
raged over how accurately Wolfe has summarized the thoughts and ideas of
Chomsky and Everett. I am sure that delights Wolfe, who has never shied away
from criticism or controversy during his long career. The criticism over the
book follows exactly the pattern that Wolfe describes when he writes about
people protecting their orthodoxies-the outsider is invariably attacked for not
being “one of us.” The experts shriek and howl: But he’s not a linguist! He
hasn’t studied linguistics and evolution for thirty years! How many books about
language has he read? He doesn’t know the territory! Well, sometimes an outsider
can provide a fresh perspective. I don’t think Wolfe is saying that his book
will be the final word on this subject. What Wolfe is really doing is
popularizing the ideas and theories he presents in The Kingdom of Speech. Because he’s a famous writer, they will invariably
get more attention. It’s fitting that Wolfe would choose to write a book about
language, since he is such a terrific writer. Wolfe has always held a high
place in the kingdom of speech.
1 comment:
As William F. Buckley once said, “Liberals claim to want to give a hearing to other views, but then are shocked and offended to discover that there are other views.”
True, liberals are at times guilty of being close-minded, no surprise, their being human, but what distinguishes them is–rather like what that old Tory Churchill had to say about democracy–that they are less so than others.
Post a Comment