Hall of Famers Edgar Martinez, Mike Mussina, and Mariano Rivera. |
2019 Hall of Famer Roy Halladay. |
Last week the results of the BBWAA vote for the Baseball
Hall of Fame were announced. Four new Hall of Famers were chosen: Mariano
Rivera, who became the first player to ever be named on 100% of the ballots,
Mike Mussina, Edgar Martinez, and the late Roy Halladay. These four players
will join Lee Smith and Harold Baines, who were elected by the Today’s Game Era
Committee in December.
First, some thoughts on the election of Smith and Baines. In my post in November when the ballot was announced, I wrote that it was quite
possible no one from that ballot would be elected. I also wrote that while I
really like Harold Baines, I didn’t expect him to be elected. Well, I was
wrong. The Committee threw everyone for a loop by choosing Baines, and the
sabermetrics folks have had a field day complaining about Baines’ election, and
how it lowers the bar for future candidates. I was pretty shocked that Baines
got in, since he received very little support from the writers when he was on
the ballot.
Baines’ election doesn’t concern me that much as far as
setting a bar for the future, since there are so few players that are truly
comparable to Baines. Are Al Oliver, Dave Parker, and Vada Pinson suddenly
going to get in because Baines did? That seems unlikely to me.
I wasn’t too shocked about Lee Smith’s election, but it did
surprise me that he was a unanimous selection of the Committee. I think Smith
was obviously one of the most dominant closers of his era, and if you’re going
to put Goose Gossage and Bruce Sutter in the Hall, you should put Smith in
there too.
Rivera’s selection being unanimous was somewhat surprising
to me. Obviously, he’s a first ballot Hall of Famer and the greatest closer
ever, but it’s hard to get 425 people to agree on anything. The reason for my
surprise at Rivera’s unanimous selection is because he’s a specialist, and it
wouldn’t surprise me if somewhere among those 425 BBWAA voters there was one
guy who was like, “I’ve never voted for a relief pitcher, and I never will. I
didn’t vote for Hoyt Wilhelm, or those guys with the weird mustaches, or Lee
Smith, and I ain’t gonna vote for Mariano.” From everything I’ve read about
Rivera off the field, it sounds like he’s a pretty remarkable person, so he’s
certainly a good choice for the first unanimous selection.
As expected, Edgar Martinez got a 15% bump and gained
election in his 10th and final year on the ballot. As I’ve written before, I just don’t feel very strongly about Edgar Martinez one way or the
other. Martinez’s election highlights some of the ridiculous absurdities of
Hall of Fame voting. In his first year on the ballot, Martinez got 36.2% of the
vote, not even halfway to the 75% needed for election. In 2014, his fifth year
on the ballot, Martinez’s support bottomed out at 25.2%. Amazingly, he gained
60% more votes in five years! But what about Edgar Martinez’s stats changed
between 2014 and 2019? Nothing! He still had 309 home runs, 1,261 RBIs, a
lifetime batting average of .312, and an OBP of .418. So why wasn’t he a Hall
of Famer five years ago? Why do people’s minds suddenly change the closer
someone gets to 75%? There’s probably at least one BBWAA member who voted for
Martinez this year who had never voted for him in the previous nine years. What
on earth was their rationale for changing their minds now? “Well, it looks like
he’s gonna get in, so I guess I should vote for him so I can say I voted for
him.” Despite how cranky I sound, I’m actually an advocate for slow thinking,
and I think it’s important for people to be able to change their minds and
re-examine new evidence. But it’s just sort of absurd for me to think that just
five years ago 75% of the voting BBWAA members DIDN’T think Edgar Martinez was
a Hall of Famer, and now 85% of them think he IS a Hall of Famer.
Roy Halladay received the exact same numbers of votes as
Martinez, earning election in his first appearance on the ballot. Sadly,
Halladay died in November of 2017 when he crashed his personal aircraft.
Halladay was a great pitcher, and he’s an interesting example of peak
performance as opposed to steady compiling. Halladay won 203 games, which is 58th
most of the 80 pitchers in the Hall of Fame. As pitcher wins become a less
important statistic, it will be interesting to see if a starter with fewer than
200 wins is ever elected.
Mike Mussina just got in with 76.7% of the vote. I think
Mussina was clearly deserving of the Hall of Fame, and I’m very glad he finally
got in. Mussina’s winning percentage is the same as Jim Palmer’s. Mussina didn’t
have some of the impressive accolades that Palmer did—Palmer was a 3-time Cy Young
Award winner and was an 8-time 20-game winner. Mussina never won a Cy Young
award and didn’t win 20 games in a season until 2008, his final season. Also,
Mussina never had a best-selling underwear poster, which probably cost him
several votes. Palmer also benefited from playing during the 1970’s, an era
when offenses were not as potent as they were in the 1990’s and 2000’s. Palmer
also benefited greatly from having Mark Belanger at shortstop and Brooks
Robinson at third base for many years, as they were probably the best fielding
shortstop/third base duo ever.
Curt Schilling jumped to 60.9%, and with three years left on
the ballot, he’ll most likely make it in, despite being a total jerk.
And speaking of total jerks, Roger Clemens and Barry Bonds
inched forward ever so slightly. Clemens is at 59.5% and Bonds is at 59.1%. Clemens
got 11 more votes than last year, moving up to 253, and Bonds added 13, moving
up to 251. However, if the number of voting BBWAA members holds steady around
420-430, with only three more years on the ballot, they’ll need to add more
than a dozen votes a year to get elected. That being said, if they keep inching
forward the next two years, they could be within distance of getting a big
enough bump in the last year on the ballot to put them over the top.
Larry Walker had a huge vote jump, gaining 20% to end up at
54.6%. He’ll need another 20% gain next year, his last on the ballot, to gain
election. As I wrote last year, Larry Walker is the Canadian Edgar Martinez for
me. Can we just agree to ignore any stats that anyone puts up in Colorado? In
the 26 seasons that the Colorado Rockies have been in existence, Rockies
players have won 11 batting titles. That’s 42%. And it includes players like
Michael Cuddyer and Justin Morneau. I’m a Twins fan, and I like Cuddy and
Morneau, but they are very fluky batting title winners.
Okay, moving on. Omar Vizquel got a nice 5% bump to get to
42.8% in his second year on the ballot. That bodes well for his future chances,
especially since he gained on a very stacked ballot.
Fred McGriff got a significant bump in his final year on the
ballot, as he was named on 39.8% of the ballots. I’ve always really liked
McGriff and I was surprised he never received more support, since he was a
slugger who presumably stayed clean of steroids. I do think that bouncing
around from team to team probably hurt McGriff’s case. Quick, close your eyes.
Picture Fred McGriff. Which team is he playing for? The Blue Jays? The Braves?
The Devil Rays? The Cubs? McGriff was great for all those teams, but he didn’t
play for any one of them long enough to be strongly identified with that team. There’s
definitely a Hall of Fame bonus for playing your whole career for one team, or
for playing for one team long enough that you become identified very closely
with that team.
Nothing too exciting happened down ballot. Two first-year
candidates get to come back again next year, as Todd Helton and Andy Pettitte both
received more than 5% of the vote. Helton was an excellent player, but as I
noted above, I’m skeptical of anyone who played their entire career in
Colorado. The most remarkable fact about Pettitte to me is that he started 521
games and only threw 4 shutouts. That’s fewer shutouts than Ervin Santana. That’s
fewer shutouts than Jim Deshaies. That’s 10% of the shutouts that Claude Osteen
threw. Granted, Osteen spent the bulk of his career pitching for the Dodgers in
the 1960’s, but Osteen threw 6 shutouts for teams other than the Dodgers, which
is still 50% more shutouts than Pettitte threw. Orel Hershiser threw more
shutouts IN ONE MONTH than Pettitte did in his entire career.
Andruw Jones just barely hung on this year, holding steady
at 7.5%, so he gets to come back for a third ballot. I’m not going to advocate
for Jones’ election, but he’s a fascinating candidate, and he deserves to at
least be considered, since he had such a great peak. Maybe he’s just taking the
Harold Baines path to the Hall of Fame.
There were some good, steady players who didn’t make it to
5% of the vote and dropped off after one year. I’m not going to say any of them
should be Hall of Famers, but there were some darn good players in there, like
Michael Young, Lance Berkman, Miguel Tejada, and Roy Oswalt. I always liked
Michael Young; he was just an excellent hitter. He ended up with a .300 batting
average over 8,600 plate appearances, which is impressive.
And at the very bottom were two players I enjoyed, the
perfectly named Placido Polanco and the speedy Juan Pierre. Polanco somehow managed
to get two votes, so I assume that he probably saved two BBWAA members from
drowning. Pierre didn’t get any votes, despite stealing 614 bases over his
career, which ranks 18th all-time. I was at a game where Juan Pierre
walked, so I was pretty excited to see that rare occurrence. I remember around
the time that Pierre got his 2,000th hit people were wringing their
hands about Pierre possibly getting 3,000 hits, because they didn’t think he
was a Hall of Famer, even if he got to 3,000 hits. As it turned out, Pierre
finished his career a mere 783 hits short of 3,000, so those prognosticators had
good reason to be worried.
"those guys with the weird mustaches", "Mussina never had a best-selling underwear poster"... if only you had slipped in some Sister Sledge reference re: Dave Parker, this post would have hit the triple crown of 70s baseball/culture references :-)
ReplyDelete